Of course, if you were reading Latino Político in January of 2007, you already knew of Kobach’s ties to FAIR. But I digress.
My question is: how many strikes will it take for Kris Kobach to lose all credibility? He already lost the Hazelton, Pennsylvania case that was another source of outcry due to extremism:
Kobach has attempted to pass severe anti-immigration laws in towns across Pennsylvania, California, Missouri, and Texas. What do these communities have in common besides Kris Kobach? They reap no benefits from the anti-immigrant laws and ordinances he is trying to implement and are often left with a costly legal mess.
In Hazelton, PA, after an ordinance crafted by Kobach and fellow IRLI attorney Michael Hethmon was struck down by a federal judge, the city was forced to pay for all legal fees.
Wow! Sounds like a wedge issue to me! And don’t let Mitt Romney slither away unnoticed: from Kobach’s campaign page for his current Secretary of State campaign in Kansas:
Policy Adviser to Presidential Candidates Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson, 2007-2008.
The ties explored by Rachel Maddow run deep within the Republican Party. It’s refreshing to see them exposed to a wider audience, especially those of the AZGOP.
It appears that one of Kris Kobach‘s vigilante colleagues in Kansas City is feeling the fire for her active participation in Minutemen hate-mongering.
Kansas City organizations representing various racial and religious groups will call today for newly appointed parks board commissioner Frances Semler to resign because of her anti-immigrant views.
And six of the 13 City Council members on Wednesday said they agreed that for the good of the park board’s image, Semler should step down.
The Coalition of Hispanic Organizations, the Jewish Community Relations Bureau/American Jewish Committee, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and other groups will gather 11:30 a.m. at Gage Park to protest Semler’s membership in the local Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, which has taken a militant stance against illegal immigrants.
This is exactly what needs to happen across the country – grassroot groups that span racial, religious, even political lines need to unite against the campaign of xenophobia that has been fueled brightly through the efforts of vigilante activism.
It’s not rocket-science to figure out that the worst aspects of human nature would be allowed time to play in the playground given the current political climate wrt immigration. I can’t help but feel the sting of burning irony that Mr. Bush is seeing his approval ratings further erode now that he has royally pissed of his base for pushing his (flawed) immigration initiative through Congress.
In the poll, Bush’s approval rating is at just 29 percent. It’s a drop of six points since April, and it represents his lowest mark ever on this question in the NBC/Journal poll.
[snip]
This drop comes as Bush tries to resuscitate the comprehensive immigration reform bill in the U.S. Senate, which has angered many Americans — particularly conservatives — because they believe its provisions allowing for a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants amount to “amnesty.” Bush and other supporters of the legislation dispute that charge.
This is truly a divided country when upwards of 75% of Republicans support the bloodthirsty sociopath and still his approval ratings are hovering or submerging under the political “Mendoza line”. (Why does that have to have a Latino connotation, btw?)
A divided nation – or is it?
Poll after poll after poll shows that the public overwhelmingly supports a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Yet, you won’t find that in the stalled Senate bill – “guest worker” sure, but that’s to appease the corporate slave-owners who want to make sure their profits continue to soar. The workers are left hanging, as usual, with tons of loopholes and continued discrimination.
So what we have at the moment is a Congress that is controlled by Democrats that are still taking their cues from the hard-liners. No attention is paid to their base (or the majority of U.S.-born Americans for that matter). They only fear of losing their jobs if they piss off the right wing too much. Sound like another issue in the headlines?
People like Frances Semler, mentioned at the beginning of this post, are not in the majority, but you would think they were after seeing the inaction of the House and Senate. Clearly, this is a problem that needs to be resolved; otherwise the case will continue to strengthen that there are no longer two-political parties, but one that is beholden to profit and power.
It was no mistake that the immigration debate in this country took a hard turn to the right last year following the marches and rallies held in March and April by the families and supporters of human rights. The GOP-led Congress at the time responded by holding a series of sham “townhall meetings” in various cities, inviting vigilante group leaders and hardline-supporters of nativist sentiment. One of the biggest cogs in that wheel was/is Kris Kobach.
An apprentice of uber-nativist Samuel Huntington, Kobach enjoys prominent media attention as a voice of opposition to comprehensive immigration reform as well as a loyal agent to the neocon wing of BushCo in the War on Terror™. As I was working on this write-up, he appeared on MSNBC to support the reprehensible remarks by Pentagon official Charles Stimson to organize a boycott of law firms working pro bono for Guantanamo detainees.
A former counsel to Attorney General John Ashcroft, and 2004 GOP Candidate for Kansas’ 3rd Congressional District (he lost to Democrat Dennis Moore due to his extreme views), Kobach is now teaching Constitutional Law, Immigration Law, American Legal History and Legislation at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law.
The local independent paper in Kansas City, The Pitch, recently offered a lengthy write-up on the controversy being waged on Kobach’s campus – including the circulation of a one-page flier (.pdf file) outlining the biased professor’s views. Here are a couple of examples:
Kobach says he’d already been considering the basics of a program that would come to be known as the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System. NSEERS mandated that men from certain Arab and Muslim nations be photographed and fingerprinted when they arrived in the United States. Men from these countries who were already U.S. residents had to register. NSEERS also required that they be interviewed 30 days after they entered the country, that they notify the Immigration and Naturalization Service if they changed their address, and that they present themselves for an annual interview while they remained on American soil.
Racial Profiling – Check
The NSEERS program wasn’t Kobach’s only foray into federal policy. In 2002, he led a reform effort that reduced the number of judges who heard immigration appeals from 23 to 11. To keep up with the increasing number of cases, the smaller cadre of judges began issuing one-line opinions in response to complex legal decisions.
Working to further destroy the immigration process instead of beefing it up – Check
Now, two years after he went down to electoral defeat, Kobach has taken a central role with FAIR.
After 9/11, a Washington, D.C., lawyer named Mike Hethmon took over FAIR’s legal department. Ashcroft’s young immigration counsel caught Hethmon’s attention as a potential ally.
In the past two years, Hethmon and Kobach have become a legal team working to shift the federal immigration debate to states and cities. Hethmon is director and general counsel of FAIR’s Immigration Reform Law Institute; Kobach, a senior counsel on paid retainer, is second-in-command.
Ties to the white-supremacy network – Check
Since I’m sure this piece will probably attract the attention of some of FAIR’s supporters, or maybe even Kobach himself, let’s hear what the Southern Poverty Law Center has to say about the organization that the professor works diligently in support of:
FAIR worked closely with a hate group, the American Immigration Control Foundation (AICF), to pay signature-gatherers for the referendum. Together, they spent $305,500. Like Abernethy, aicf’s leader, John Vinson, is an adviser to the CCC, a group that has described blacks as a “retrograde species of humanity.” FAIR has not criticized Vinson in any way.
FAIR worked with aicf in another group, the Coalition for the Future of the American Worker (CFAW), that recently ran harsh anti-immigration ads in a Texas congressional race. Both the Republican and the Democratic campaigns in that race have denounced the ads as racially inflammatory and asked that television stations not run them. cfaw’s president is FAIR Executive Director Dan Stein.
FAIR’s Western Regional Coordinator, Rick Oltman, is a member of the CCC, according to that group’s own newspaper. Oltman shared the podium with Abernethy at a 1997 CCC conference.
In September 2002, FAIR’s Eastern Regional Coordinator, Jim Stadenraus, participated in a Long Island anti-immigration conference with Jared Taylor, a CCC board member and the founder and head of another hate group, the New Century Foundation.
FAIR’s Dan Stein is an editorial adviser to The Social Contract, a journal that is published by a hate group and has featured articles by Abernethy. The journal is edited by Wayne Lutton, another adviser to the CCC.
FAIR cites on its Web site a man named Fred Elbel, who is PAN’s webmaster and also heads the Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform — another group which Abernethy advises. Elbel is tied to FAIR founder John Tanton.
Like most nativists, Kris Kobach scoffs at being labeled racist – yet he is the architect of the surge of local level anti-immigrant and anti-Latino legislation that began in Hazelton, Pennsylvania.
In November, Hazleton Mayor Lou Barletta told CBS’ 60 Minutes that the aim of the ordinance was simple: “I’m going to eliminate illegal aliens from the city of Hazleton.”
Kobach is helping him do it.
“We looked at the Hazleton ordinance and said, ‘Uh oh,'” Hethmon recalls. “The idea was great, the concept was absolutely valid, but it was clearly drafted by some average folks sitting around a table. So we brought the issue up with Kris immediately.”
Hethmon and Kobach quickly created a model ordinance. By the end of 2006, about 50 municipalities had passed or were considering similar legislation.
Kris Kobach is one of those dangerous propaganda organs who looks good on paper due to his Ivy League education – but his actions have led to the restriction of opportunity for countless families across the United States. Here is an excerpt from an opinion piece he wrote for the Heritage Foundation late last year in response to the comprehensive immigration bill in the Senate.
Furthermore, the DREAM Act makes it absurdly easy for just about any illegal alien—even one who does not qualify for the amnesty—to evade the law. According to Section 624(f), once an alien files an application—anyapplication, no matter how ridiculous—the federal government is prohibited from deporting him. Moreover, with few exceptions, federal officers are prohibited from either using information from the application to deport the alien or sharing that information with another federal agency, under threat of up to $10,000 fine.
Thus, an alien’s admission that he has violated federal immigration law cannot be used against him—even if he never had any chance of qualifying for the DREAM Act amnesty in the first place. The DREAM Act also makes illegal aliens eligible for various federal student loans and work-study programs.
You would think a professor would advocate for people to get an education instead of spending every waking moment denying it to the wrong type of person. It is this type of behavior that has led groups such as the The Hispanic Bar Association of Greater Kansas City, the MoKan chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association and the local Coalition of Hispanic Organizations to lobby the Dean of UMKC’s Law School to express their outrage at his dual role of anti-immigrant crusader and professor of Immigration Law.
Speaking during his 2004 Congressional Campaign, Kris Kobach had this to say “I think anyone who knows me knows that I’m pretty thick-skinned. And I certainly hope I have been humble.”
I dunno about you, but I don’t think he knows the true meaning of the word “humble”.
LatinoPolítico.com 